The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dungeon Crawlers
Magic: The Gathering: Duels of the Planeswalkers (2009)
Diablo III
Neuroshima Hex!
Archon: The Light and the Dark
Minecraft
Elder Sign: Omens
Wind-Up Knight
Battle Chess
Karateka
Torchlight
Crysis
Tiny Tower
The Battle for Wesnoth
North & South
Royal Envoy
Civilization V
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Shadow Era
Ascension: Chronicle of the Godslayer
Infinity Blade II
Final Fantasy Tactics
Slaves to Armok II: Dwarf Fortress
The Secret of Monkey Island
Virtual Boy
Beneath a Steel Sky
Angband
Dragon Age: Origins - Awakening
Neverwinter Nights
Nelson Tethers: Puzzle Agent
Team Fortress 2
Ticket to Ride
Unreal Tournament 2004
Uplink
King of Dragon Pass
Tilt to Live
Windosill
Aralon: Sword and Shadow
Dungeon Raid
L.A. Noire
Torchlight 2
Magic: The Gathering - Duels of the Planeswalkers 2012
Hey, That's My Fish!
Crimson: Steam Pirates
Batman: Arkham City
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Starbase Orion
To the Moon
Junk Jack
Written Legends: Nightmare at Sea
Search: Titles Only:
Index | All | Recent | Guidelines
Article Edit | History | Editors

Combinatorial games

Combinatorial games by definition are 2-player games with alternating turns, no hidden information, and no chance, e.g. Go and GIPF.

Combinatorial games are often called "abstract games", which is an ambigouous term since "abstract" is also often used to mean "themeless". Theme or lack of theme is irrelevant to whether a game is combinatorial. Played 2-player, games like Stephensons Rocket and König von Siam are combinatorial games, but many gamers would not call them abstract, due to their historical themes.

The term comes from mathematics (famously developed by Elwyn R. Berlekamp, John Conway, and Richard K. Guy in their book Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays) which analyzes such games. Traditionally the first player who cannot make a move is the loser in combinatorial games, but the theory is generalizable to include other types of end condition such as score or capture of a specific piece.

Combinatorial Game Theory has been used to analyze and even improve AI computer players of some classic games.

Traditionally the 2 players are called Left and Right. (Basically the same as saying Black and White in chess, for example.)

In the strictest definition, a combinatorial game is guaranteed to terminate with one player winning (no ties/draws possible). Under that assumption, one of the basic theorems (which is not hard to prove) of CGT is that every game (i.e. game position) falls into one of these 4 classes:

N = fuzzy : the Next player to play (whether they are Left or Right) can force a win
P = zero : the Previous player who played (or 2nd to play) can force a win
L = positive : Left can force a win, regardless of who moves first
R = negative : Right can force a win, regardless of who moves first

It is easy to think of trivial examples of games for any of these categories. E.g. consider a trivial game where both players have some chips. On their turn a player must give up 1 or more of their chips. If a player have no chips to give up, then they lose. Obviously the optimal strategy is to give up only 1 chip each turn. What type of game is this? If both players start with an equal number of chips, then whoever moves next will lose eventually, running out of chips just before the opponent. If Left has more chips, then Left can force a win, regardless of who moves next. If Right has more chips, then Right can force a win.

See:

[What Links Here]
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.